Kellogg, a shop worker at Pere Marquette, thought the yellow pine was just as good as oak, but the prosecutor cited mail car regulations calling for steel plates that would prevent telescoping, thereby offering added protection to the mail and the employees who rode the mail cars. Was it a poorly written order that caused the wreck? Was there negligence by the crew of 71? The chief train dispatcher, Gilbert W. Groom, had 13 letters in his name as did Theodore Ensel, the division superintendent; William C.
The causes of train wrecks and how to prevent them
Hurst, the trainmaster of the division; and Nels Jorgensen, the roadmaster. Salem, Michigan, has 13 letters.
- Pretty Nude Uncensored - Sampler!
- 101 Foods That Could Save Your Life.
- Buck (The Cowboys).
Train order No. Ann Arbor, MI umichnews umich.
Search for: Search. But do they? In this series , The Times is going back to the scene of major news events to see if those promises were kept. The runaway train hurtled into the center of town shortly after midnight, with no one aboard to apply the brakes or sound a whistle to warn residents about the deadly cargo bearing down on them.
When it reached a tight curve, the freight train, going 65 miles an hour, derailed. Amid a deafening, horrific screech of rupturing metal, more than a million gallons of fuel spilled and exploded. In a community of just 5,, 47 people were killed.
Railroad Accidents: Common Causes, Statistics and Prevention
The scale of the disaster on July 6, , not only shocked and outraged Canada, it also raised alarm in towns and cities across the country, where a growing number of trains, laden with oil, explosives and toxic chemicals, were rolling through urban centers day and night.
Railways are now required to look for alternative routes to keep shipments of dangerous goods out of urban areas, but trains filled with risky cargo still rumble day and night through Calgary, Edmonton, Montreal, Toronto and other cities. Six years after the catastrophe, the core of the town remains a wasteland, with much of the once-vibrant downtown a weed lot. It also followed a trend of deregulation that had turned over much in the way of safety oversight to the railways themselves.
And for the first time, railways now must be licensed by Transport Canada to operate. If the regulator finds serious safety violations, it can immediately revoke that permit. But the efficacy of some of these changes remains an open question. And one of the most important new rules comes with a loophole enormous enough for train after train to barrel right through.
In , the government ordered all railways to start examining the routes they were using to ship dangerous cargos. They were told to see if they could identify alternative runs using remote rail lines instead of ones threading through urban areas. In theory, this regulation could help reduce the chances of a deadly accident in a populated area.
Locomotives pulling tanker cars heavy with oil, propane and noxious chemicals continue to be a common sight in the hearts of several major Canadian cities.
Fundraiser for Concord father of 7 killed in wrong-way crash raises nearly $,
Naish said. The Federal Railroad Administration requires similar reviews of routes with dangerous cargos in the United States. The cars that ruptured were an old design, called DOT, with limited crash resistance. Lisa Raitt, who became the transport minister in the Conservative government nine days after the crash, announced that this design would be gradually phased out, and that by , these tankers would no longer be carrying flammable products.
Taking the place of many of the old tankers is a new design, with substantial reinforcement and other safety improvements, called DOT But limitations in crash testing mean that while the new cars promise much on paper, their effectiveness in a real-world disaster remains to be seen. Fox, of the safety board. Another critical policy change was an order given just weeks after the disaster obligating all trains in Canada to once again carry at least two crew members.
In the United States, the Federal Railroad Administration recently abandoned a proposed regulation that would have required at least two-person crews on most trains.